Upgrade your streaming device with these Fire TV Sticks starting at just $25

that population will not recover on its own.

This substantial compensation package might have still stood if Teslas board could prove it was fair.The case was brought by a shareholder because Teslas board did not give them the opportunity to make informed decisions.

who held some of the most influential corporate positions (CEO.to the point where the court found it unclear whether he was acting for Musk or for Tesla.Musk posted shortly after the judgement was handed down.

it was Musk himself who proposed the size and structure of his compensation.they had actually been misinformed about key factors in the decision making process.

violating their legal obligation to its shareholders.

dictating the terms the committee considered and eventually approved.a major Alibaba shareholder with a stake worth $3.

at a time when the Chinese tech giant has undergone frequent organizational restructures.It has now suspended its logistics arm Cainiao’s Hong Kong IPO application and canceled plans to divest from its cloud operation.

in a major signal to the outside world that Alibaba is aware it needs to make changes to keep its customers.8 billion on buybacks in the first quarter.